Skip Navigation


Briefings in Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on June 23, 2009
Briefings in Bioinformatics 2009 10(5):547-555; doi:10.1093/bib/bbp033
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/5/547    most recent
bbp033v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elo, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Aittokallio, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elo, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Aittokallio, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Optimized detection of differential expression in global profiling experiments: case studies in clinical transcriptomic and quantitative proteomic datasets

Laura L. Elo, Jukka Hiissa, Jarno Tuimala, Aleksi Kallio, Eija Korpelainen and Tero Aittokallio

Corresponding author. Laura L. Elo, Department of Mathematics, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland. Tel: +358 2 333 6027; Fax: +358 2 333 6595; E-mail: laliel{at}utu.fi

Identification of reliable molecular markers that show differential expression between distinct groups of samples has remained a fundamental research problem in many large-scale profiling studies, such as those based on DNA microarray or mass-spectrometry technologies. Despite the availability of a wide spectrum of statistical procedures, the users of the high-throughput platforms are still facing the crucial challenge of deciding which test statistic is best adapted to the intrinsic properties of their own datasets. To meet this challenge, we recently introduced an adaptive procedure, named ROTS (Reproducibility-Optimized Test Statistic), which learns an optimal statistic directly from the given data, and whose relative benefits have previously been shown in comparison with state-of-the-art procedures for detecting differential expression. Using gene expression microarray and mass-spectrometry (MS)-based protein expression datasets as case studies, we illustrate here the practical usage and advantages of ROTS toward detecting reliable marker lists in clinical transcriptomic and proteomic studies. In a public leukemia microarray dataset, the procedure could improve the sensitivity of the gene marker lists detected with high specificity. When applied to a recent LC-MS dataset, involving plasma samples from severe burn patients, the procedure could identify several peptide markers that remained undetected in the conventional analysis, thus demonstrating the effectiveness of ROTS also for global quantitative proteomic studies. To promote its widespread usage, we have made freely available efficient implementations of ROTS, which are easily accessible either as a stand-alone R-package or as integrated in the open-source data analysis software Chipster.

Keywords: clinical material, DNA microarray, mass-spectrometry, gene expression, quantitative proteomics, differential expression, reproducibility

Submitted: March 30, 2009. Received (in revised form): June 3, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
T. Aittokallio
Dealing with missing values in large-scale studies: microarray data imputation and beyond
Brief Bioinform, December 4, 2009; (2009) bbp059v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.