Skip Navigation


Briefings in Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on May 23, 2006
Briefings in Bioinformatics 2006 7(3):225-242; doi:10.1093/bib/bbl004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
7/3/225    most recent
bbl004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedberg, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedberg, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Automated protein function prediction—the genomic challenge

Iddo Friedberg

Iddo Friedberg, Burnham Institute for Medical Research, Program in Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. E-mail: idoerg{at}burnham.org

Overwhelmed with genomic data, biologists are facing the first big post-genomic question—what do all genes do? First, not only is the volume of pure sequence and structure data growing, but its diversity is growing as well, leading to a disproportionate growth in the number of uncharacterized gene products. Consequently, established methods of gene and protein annotation, such as homology-based transfer, are annotating less data and in many cases are amplifying existing erroneous annotation. Second, there is a need for a functional annotation which is standardized and machine readable so that function prediction programs could be incorporated into larger workflows. This is problematic due to the subjective and contextual definition of protein function. Third, there is a need to assess the quality of function predictors. Again, the subjectivity of the term ‘function’ and the various aspects of biological function make this a challenging effort. This article briefly outlines the history of automated protein function prediction and surveys the latest innovations in all three topics.

Keywords: computational function prediction, genomic annotation, gene ontology, phylogenomics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
C. Gancedo and C.-L. Flores
Moonlighting Proteins in Yeasts
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2008; 72(1): 197 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
I. V. Tetko, I. V. Rodchenkov, M. C. Walter, T. Rattei, and H.-W. Mewes
Beyond the 'best' match: machine learning annotation of protein sequences by integration of different sources of information
Bioinformatics, March 1, 2008; 24(5): 621 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Schlicker and M. Albrecht
FunSimMat: a comprehensive functional similarity database
Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D434 - D439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
S. D. Mooney and P. H. Baenziger
Extensible open source content management systems and frameworks: a solution for many needs of a bioinformatics group
Brief Bioinform, January 1, 2008; 9(1): 69 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
H. Shin, A. M. Lisewski, and O. Lichtarge
Graph sharpening plus graph integration: a synergy that improves protein functional classification
Bioinformatics, December 1, 2007; 23(23): 3217 - 3224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.