Skip Navigation


Briefings in Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on April 29, 2008
Briefings in Bioinformatics 2008 9(5):345-354; doi:10.1093/bib/bbn022
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/5/345    most recent
bbn022v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Page, R. D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Page, R. D. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Biodiversity informatics: the challenge of linking data and the role of shared identifiers

Roderic D. M. Page

Roderic D. M. Page, Division of Environmental and Evolutional Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. Tel: +44 141 330 4778; Fax: +44 141 330 2792; E-mail: r.page{at}bio.gla.ac.uk

A major challenge facing biodiversity informatics is integrating data stored in widely distributed databases. Initial efforts have relied on taxonomic names as the shared identifier linking records in different databases. However, taxonomic names have limitations as identifiers, being neither stable nor globally unique, and the pace of molecular taxonomic and phylogenetic research means that a lot of information in public sequence databases is not linked to formal taxonomic names. This review explores the use of other identifiers, such as specimen codes and GenBank accession numbers, to link otherwise disconnected facts in different databases. The structure of these links can also be exploited using the PageRank algorithm to rank the results of searches on biodiversity databases. The key to rich integration is a commitment to deploy and reuse globally unique, shared identifiers [such as Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) and Life Science Identifiers (LSIDs)], and the implementation of services that link those identifiers.

Keywords: biodiversity informatics, DOI, identifiers, knowledge integration, LSID, Semantic Web, taxonomy

Submitted: February 26, 2008. Received (in revised form): April 3, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Brief BioinformHome page
B. P. Vandervalk, E. L. McCarthy, and M. D. Wilkinson
Moby and Moby 2: Creatures of the Deep (Web)
Brief Bioinform, March 1, 2009; 10(2): 114 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
R. Guralnick and A. Hill
Biodiversity informatics: automated approaches for documenting global biodiversity patterns and processes
Bioinformatics, February 15, 2009; 25(4): 421 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.