Skip Navigation


Briefings in Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on April 3, 2009
Briefings in Bioinformatics 2009 10(5):537-546; doi:10.1093/bib/bbp016
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/5/537    most recent
bbp016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baek, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baek, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2009. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Development of biomarker classifiers from high-dimensional data

Songjoon Baek, Chen-An Tsai and James J. Chen

Corresponding author. Dr James J. Chen, HFT-20, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA. Tel: +1-870-543-7007; Fax: +1-870-543-7662; E-mail: jamesj.chen{at}fda.hhs.gov

Recent development of high-throughput technology has accelerated interest in the development of molecular biomarker classifiers for safety assessment, disease diagnostics and prognostics, and prediction of response for patient assignment. This article reviews and evaluates some important aspects and key issues in the development of biomarker classifiers. Development of a biomarker classifier for high-throughput data involves two components: (i) model building and (ii) performance assessment. This article focuses on feature selection in model building and cross validation for performance assessment. A ‘frequency’ approach to feature selection is presented and compared to the ‘conventional’ approach in terms of the predictive accuracy and stability of the selected feature set. The two approaches are compared based on four biomarker classifiers, each with a different feature selection method and well-known classification algorithm. In each of the four classifiers the feature predictor set selected by the frequency approach is more stable than the feature set selected by the conventional approach.

Keywords: class prediction, cross-validation, feature selection, frequency of selection, stable feature set

Submitted: January 14, 2009. Received (in revised form): February 21, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.