<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Briefings in Bioinformatics - current issue</title>
<link>http://bib.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Briefings in Bioinformatics - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1477-4054</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>July 2009</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Briefings in Bioinformatics</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1467-5463</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/343?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/345?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/354?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/367?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/378?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/392?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/408?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/424?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/435?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/450?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/462?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/343?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial]]></title>
<link>http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/343?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dubitzky, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bib/bbp031</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>344</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>343</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/345?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Approaches to neuroscience data integration]]></title>
<link>http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/345?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>As the number of neuroscience databases increases, the need for neuroscience data integration grows. This paper reviews and compares several approaches, including the Neuroscience Database Gateway (NDG), Neuroscience Information Framework (NIF) and Entrez Neuron, which enable neuroscience database annotation and integration. These approaches cover a range of activities spanning from registry, discovery and integration of a wide variety of neuroscience data sources. They also provide different user interfaces for browsing, querying and displaying query results. In Entrez Neuron, for example, four different facets or tree views (neuron, neuronal property, gene and drug) are used to hierarchically organize concepts that can be used for querying a collection of ontologies. The facets are also used to define the structure of the query results.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheung, K.-H., Lim, E., Samwald, M., Chen, H., Marenco, L., Holford, M. E., Morse, T. M., Mutalik, P., Shepherd, G. M., Miller, P. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bib/bbp029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Approaches to neuroscience data integration]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>353</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>345</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/354?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Genome assembly reborn: recent computational challenges]]></title>
<link>http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/354?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Research into genome assembly algorithms has experienced a resurgence due to new challenges created by the development of next generation sequencing technologies. Several genome assemblers have been published in recent years specifically targeted at the new sequence data; however, the ever-changing technological landscape leads to the need for continued research. In addition, the low cost of next generation sequencing data has led to an increased use of sequencing in new settings. For example, the new field of metagenomics relies on large-scale sequencing of entire microbial communities instead of isolate genomes, leading to new computational challenges. In this article, we outline the major algorithmic approaches for genome assembly and describe recent developments in this domain.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pop, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bib/bbp026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Genome assembly reborn: recent computational challenges]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>366</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>354</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/367?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Computational biology for cardiovascular biomarker discovery]]></title>
<link>http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/367?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Computational biology is essential in the process of translating biological knowledge into clinical practice, as well as in the understanding of biological phenomena based on the resources and technologies originating from the clinical environment. One such key contribution of computational biology is the discovery of biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes using &lsquo;omic&rsquo; information. This process involves the predictive modelling and integration of different types of data and knowledge for screening, diagnostic or prognostic purposes. Moreover, this requires the design and combination of different methodologies based on statistical analysis and machine learning. This article introduces key computational approaches and applications to biomarker discovery based on different types of &lsquo;omic&rsquo; data. Although we emphasize applications in cardiovascular research, the computational requirements and advances discussed here are also relevant to other domains. We will start by introducing some of the contributions of computational biology to translational research, followed by an overview of methods and technologies used for the identification of biomarkers with predictive or classification value. The main types of &lsquo;omic&rsquo; approaches to biomarker discovery will be presented with specific examples from cardiovascular research. This will include a review of computational methodologies for single-source and integrative data applications. Major computational methods for model evaluation will be described together with recommendations for reporting models and results. We will present recent advances in cardiovascular biomarker discovery based on the combination of gene expression and functional network analyses. The review will conclude with a discussion of key challenges for computational biology, including perspectives from the biosciences and clinical areas.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azuaje, F., Devaux, Y., Wagner, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bib/bbp008</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Computational biology for cardiovascular biomarker discovery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>377</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>367</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/378?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[FINDSITE: a combined evolution/structure-based approach to protein function prediction]]></title>
<link>http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/378?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A key challenge of the post-genomic era is the identification of the function(s) of all the molecules in a given organism. Here, we review the status of sequence and structure-based approaches to protein function inference and ligand screening that can provide functional insights for a significant fraction of the ~50% of ORFs of unassigned function in an average proteome. We then describe FINDSITE, a recently developed algorithm for ligand binding site prediction, ligand screening and molecular function prediction, which is based on binding site conservation across evolutionary distant proteins identified by threading. Importantly, FINDSITE gives comparable results when high-resolution experimental structures as well as predicted protein models are used.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skolnick, J., Brylinski, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bib/bbp017</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[FINDSITE: a combined evolution/structure-based approach to protein function prediction]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>391</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>378</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/392?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biological knowledge management: the emerging role of the Semantic Web technologies]]></title>
<link>http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/392?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>New knowledge is produced at a continuously increasing speed, and the list of papers, databases and other knowledge sources that a researcher in the life sciences needs to cope with is actually turning into a problem rather than an asset. The adequate management of knowledge is therefore becoming fundamentally important for life scientists, especially if they work with approaches that thoroughly depend on knowledge integration, such as systems biology. Several initiatives to organize biological knowledge sources into a readily exploitable resourceome are presently being carried out. Ontologies and Semantic Web technologies revolutionize these efforts. Here, we review the benefits, trends, current possibilities, and the potential this holds for the biosciences.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antezana, E., Kuiper, M., Mironov, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bib/bbp024</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biological knowledge management: the emerging role of the Semantic Web technologies]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>407</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>392</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/408?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Computational methods for discovering gene networks from expression data]]></title>
<link>http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/408?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Designing and conducting experiments are routine practices for modern biologists. The real challenge, especially in the post-genome era, usually comes not from acquiring data, but from subsequent activities such as data processing, analysis, knowledge generation and gaining insight into the research question of interest. The approach of inferring gene regulatory networks (GRNs) has been flourishing for many years, and new methods from mathematics, information science, engineering and social sciences have been applied. We review different kinds of computational methods biologists use to infer networks of varying levels of accuracy and complexity. The primary concern of biologists is how to translate the inferred network into hypotheses that can be tested with real-life experiments. Taking the biologists&rsquo; viewpoint, we scrutinized several methods for predicting GRNs in mammalian cells, and more importantly show how the power of different knowledge databases of different types can be used to identify modules and subnetworks, thereby reducing complexity and facilitating the generation of testable hypotheses.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, W.-P., Tzou, W.-S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bib/bbp028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Computational methods for discovering gene networks from expression data]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>423</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>408</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/424?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Computational systems biology of the cell cycle]]></title>
<link>http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/424?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>One of the early success stories of computational systems biology was the work done on cell-cycle regulation. The earliest mathematical descriptions of cell-cycle control evolved into very complex, detailed computational models that describe the regulation of cell division in many different cell types. On the way these models predicted several dynamical properties and unknown components of the system that were later experimentally verified/identified. Still, research on this field is far from over. We need to understand how the core cell-cycle machinery is controlled by internal and external signals, also in yeast cells and in the more complex regulatory networks of higher eukaryotes. Furthermore, there are many computational challenges what we face as new types of data appear thanks to continuing advances in experimental techniques. We have to deal with cell-to-cell variations, revealed by single cell measurements, as well as the tremendous amount of data flowing from high throughput machines. We need new computational concepts and tools to handle these data and develop more detailed, more precise models of cell-cycle regulation in various organisms. Here we review past and present of computational modeling of cell-cycle regulation, and discuss possible future directions of the field.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Csikasz-Nagy, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bib/bbp005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Computational systems biology of the cell cycle]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>434</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>424</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/435?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Flux balance analysis of biological systems: applications and challenges]]></title>
<link>http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/435?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Systems level modelling and simulations of biological processes are proving to be invaluable in obtaining a quantitative and dynamic perspective of various aspects of cellular function. In particular, constraint-based analyses of metabolic networks have gained considerable popularity for simulating cellular metabolism, of which flux balance analysis (FBA), is most widely used. Unlike mechanistic simulations that depend on accurate kinetic data, which are scarcely available, FBA is based on the principle of conservation of mass in a network, which utilizes the stoichiometric matrix and a biologically relevant objective function to identify optimal reaction flux distributions. FBA has been used to analyse genome-scale reconstructions of several organisms; it has also been used to analyse the effect of perturbations, such as gene deletions or drug inhibitions <I>in silico</I>. This article reviews the usefulness of FBA as a tool for gaining biological insights, advances in methodology enabling integration of regulatory information and thermodynamic constraints, and finally addresses the challenges that lie ahead. Various use scenarios and biological insights obtained from FBA, and applications in fields such metabolic engineering and drug target identification, are also discussed. Genome-scale constraint-based models have an immense potential for building and testing hypotheses, as well as to guide experimentation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raman, K., Chandra, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bib/bbp011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Flux balance analysis of biological systems: applications and challenges]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>449</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>435</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/450?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The virtual cell--a candidate co-ordinator for 'middle-out' modelling of biological systems]]></title>
<link>http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/450?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Understanding the functioning of biological systems depends on tackling complexity spanning spatial scales from genome to organ to whole organism. The basic unit of life, the cell, acts to co-ordinate information received across these scales and processes the myriad of signals to produce an integrated cellular response. Cells interact with and respond to other cells through direct or indirect contact, resulting in emergent structure and function of tissues and organs. Systems biology has traditionally used either a &lsquo;top-down&rsquo; or &lsquo;bottom-up&rsquo; approach. However, neither approach takes account of heterogeneity or &lsquo;noise&rsquo;, which is an inherent feature of cellular behaviour and may have significant impact on system level behaviour. We review existing approaches to modelling that use cellular automata or agent-based methodologies, where individual cells are represented as equivalent virtual entities governed by simple rules. These paradigms allow a direct one-to-one mapping between real and virtual cells that can be exploited in terms of acquiring parameters from experimental systems, or for model validation. Such models are inherently extensible and can be integrated with other modelling modalities (e.g. partial or ordinary differential equations) to model multi-scale phenomena. Alternatively, hierarchical agent models may be used to explore the functions of biological systems across temporal and spatial scales. This review examines individual-based models and the application of the paradigm to explore multi-scale phenomena in biology. In so doing, it demonstrates how cellular-based models have begun to play an important role in the development of &lsquo;middle-out&rsquo; models, but with considerable potential for future development.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walker, D. C., Southgate, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bib/bbp010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The virtual cell--a candidate co-ordinator for 'middle-out' modelling of biological systems]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>461</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>450</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/462?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring autonomy through computational biomodelling]]></title>
<link>http://bib.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/10/4/462?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The question of whether living organisms possess autonomy of action is tied up with the nature of causal efficacy. Yet the nature of organisms is such that they frequently defy conventional causal language. Did the fig wasp select the fig, or vice versa? Is this an epithelial cell because of its genetic structure, or because it develops within the epithelium? The intimate coupling of biological levels of organisation leads developmental systems theory to deconstruct the biological organism into a life-cycle process which constitutes itself from the resources available within a complete developmental system. This radical proposal necessarily raises questions regarding the ontological status of organisms: Does an organism possess existence distinguishable from its molecular composition and social environment? The ambiguity of biological causality makes such questions difficult to answer or even formulate, and computational biology has an important role to play in operationalising the language in which they are framed. In this article we review the role played by computational biomodels in shedding light on the ontological status of organisms. These models are drawn from backgrounds ranging from molecular kinetics to niche construction, and all attempt to trace biological processes to a causal, and therefore existent, source. We conclude that computational biomodelling plays a fertile role in furnishing a proof of concept for conjectures in the philosophy of biology, and suggests the need for a process-based ontology of biological systems.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Palfreyman, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bib/bbp003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring autonomy through computational biomodelling]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Oxford University Press</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>474</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>462</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Papers</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>